Forex investment experience sharing, Forex account managed and trading.
MAM | PAMM | POA.
Forex proprietary company | Asset management company | Personal large funds.
Formal starting from $500,000, test starting from $50,000.
Profits are shared by half (50%), and losses are shared by a quarter (25%).
Forex multi-account manager Z-X-N
Accepts global forex account operation, investment, and trading
Assists family office investment and autonomous management
In the field of strategy selection for foreign exchange investment transactions, the breakthrough point opening strategy, the callback opening strategy and the turning point opening strategy are closely adapted to the specific market ecological pattern, showing unique professional advantages.
For the market conditions in a strong unilateral trend, given that the trend has a very high degree of recognizability and stability, opening a trading position at almost any price node can be reasonably identified as the optimal decision-making time that fits the current market. This situation is mainly attributed to the clarity of the market trend, which enables traders to rely on a more determined and resolute professional attitude to follow the trend dynamic trajectory and advance the operation process in an orderly manner.
In sharp contrast, when in a weak trend market situation, price fluctuations show relatively mild and stable rhythmic characteristics, and the forward trend is obscure. In this specific context, the pullback opening strategy can often highlight more outstanding and significant advantages and effectiveness, because it can provide traders with a rare opportunity to accurately and timely intervene in the market when the price retreats to a relatively stable and highly predictable key level, thereby effectively achieving the core goal of effectively reducing entry risks.
When market sentiment is in chaos and difficult to accurately understand and control, prudently selecting a pullback opening strategy undoubtedly constitutes a professional and safe response strategy paradigm. The core advantage of this strategy is not to rely on overly detailed and complex in-depth analysis and accurate prediction of market sentiment, but to focus on the internal logic of price fluctuations, relying on calm and determined patience to wait for the appearance of price pullback nodes, so as to deeply explore more solid and reliable entry signal guidance.
However, it must be emphasized that every professional practitioner active in the forefront of foreign exchange investment and trading naturally has significant individual differences that cannot be ignored in terms of personal personality traits, capital reserve scale, analysis and judgment perspective, and even psychological state of day trading, and these differentiated factors all exert a key and decisive influence on the process of making opening decisions. In view of this, there is no fixed, rigid, and unchanging universal entry model in objective reality that can be generalized to all complex, changeable, and turbulent market scenarios. Traders should flexibly and strategically screen and appropriately adjust the trading methods and strategy combinations that meet their own personalized needs based on their unique trading style preferences, risk-bearing boundaries, and deep insights and professional understanding of market dynamics. The key point is to avoid falling into a rigid and stereotyped mindset and to stop stubbornly sticking to a single and solidified trading model. Instead, we should closely focus on the dynamic changes of the market and our own actual objective situation, and uphold a scientific and rational attitude of professional and rigorous analysis of specific problems, and then carefully draw up a trading blueprint that best matches and is suitable for our own conditions with our profound professional skills.
In the professional field of foreign exchange investment and trading strategy research, the three entry modes of breakthrough point opening, callback opening and inflection point opening each show their unique professional attributes and precisely adapted market scenarios.
From a rigorous long-term investment academic perspective, and analyzing at the statistical significance level, theoretically, there is a high probability that there is no significant difference in opening positions at any point. The main reason for this phenomenon is the inherent characteristics of random walk naturally presented by the foreign exchange market, which leads to the acquisition of long-term investment returns, which depends more on the precise control of the overall market trend and effective risk management practices, rather than simply focusing on the details of a specific entry node.
From the perspective of professional advantages, the breakthrough point opening strategy is that it can accurately capture the initial critical stage of the market trend with an extremely agile and efficient attitude. If the subsequent market trend is stable and continues to extend, and there is no retracement fluctuation, then traders can cleverly avoid the psychological impact disturbance caused by frequent price fluctuations, and then effectively avoid the stop loss risk hidden dangers that may be triggered by price retracement factors, and ensure the smooth and stable trading process. However, it should not be ignored that there are also professional risks hidden behind this strategy that cannot be underestimated. Once the market trend is difficult to continue and a retracement occurs suddenly, especially when the point is not in the historical bottom range with strong support characteristics, traders are very likely to bear an unexpectedly huge psychological burden, and at the same time, they are actually facing the stop loss risk dilemma at the actual operation level, which has an adverse impact on the investment portfolio.
The pullback opening strategy is implemented prudently only after the market trend has experienced a certain degree of reasonable retracement, and has been verified by rigorous technical analysis and market signals and has been confirmed to be stable. Such a refined operation path has a significant effect on reducing various potential risks derived from trend retracement. It can not only effectively shorten the psychological pressure cycle of traders in the trading process, but also effectively reduce the probability of being forced to hastily execute stop-loss orders due to further price fluctuations in an unfavorable direction, laying a solid foundation for the steady advancement of transactions. This strategy is highly suitable for professional traders who expect to operate steadily in a relatively stable and controllable market environment, and who have a keen sense of risk and precise and prudent control.
The turning point opening strategy relies on a comprehensive and in-depth quantitative analysis of market trends, and is decisively launched at the key node when it is accurately confirmed that the market trend has undergone a substantial change. It also has the excellent performance of reducing the risks caused by trend retracement, alleviating the psychological torment cycle of traders, and reducing the risk of stop loss. However, it must be clear that the accurate determination of inflection points is not an easy task, and often places extremely high demands on the professional analytical skills and deep market insight of traders. Because once there is a mistake or deviation in the inflection point judgment link, it is very likely to trigger a series of unfavorable trading chain reactions, resulting in investment returns that fall short of expectations, or even cause principal losses.
Combining the above key points, it can be seen that the choice of entry method to start the foreign exchange investment and trading journey ultimately depends on the professional risk bearing capacity, in-depth market analysis ability, and accurate judgment level of market trends possessed by individual traders. In fact, in the complex ecosystem of foreign exchange investment and trading, there is no one entry method that naturally has an overwhelming advantage over other methods. The key point is how traders can use these strategies flexibly and subtly based on their own unique professional trading style, closely combined with the real-time dynamic market situation, and coordinate the implementation of scientific and effective risk management measures, so as to fully optimize their own trading decision-making process and maximize investment benefits.
In the field of foreign exchange trading, breakout strategies usually show the most outstanding effectiveness in the stage of violent market fluctuations.
When the market presents a clear and certain trend, its price fluctuations have the characteristics of highly integrated coherence and stability. In this case, the breakthrough strategy can accurately grasp the significant change range of prices, so as to achieve the goal of maximizing profits. In sharp contrast, in an environment where the market is in a small fluctuation, the price fluctuation frequency is high and the direction is significantly uncertain. If the breakthrough strategy is blindly adopted in this situation, investors are very likely to fall into the trap of false price breakthroughs. Such misjudgment will cause investors to deviate in the process of analyzing and judging market trends, and then frequently make wrong trading decisions. In the end, it is not only difficult to achieve the expected trading results, but also may expose investors to more severe risk exposure of capital loss.
In the field of foreign exchange investment and trading, breakthrough strategies are often misunderstood and improperly used by market participants.
In terms of the box breakthrough model, investors often face the trade-off between two key participation opportunities: one is to intervene decisively at the moment of the box breakthrough; the other is to wait for the price to step back and confirm support before participating.
In terms of the specific scenario of the peak breakthrough, a common investment mistake is to rush into the market as soon as the price touches and breaks through the previous high. A more stable and scientific strategy should be to patiently wait for the price to pull back to the previous low area, and confirm that the solid bottoming process has been completed, and then enter the market when the price shows a strong upward trend again.
The core advantage of this strategy is that it can accurately and effectively narrow the stop loss range. In sharp contrast, the practice of rashly entering the market when breaking through the previous high is very likely to cause the stop loss space to be unreasonably enlarged.
From the perspective of long-term operation of foreign exchange investment, comprehensively considering the probability factors of market fluctuations and reasonably setting relatively compact stop-loss positions often show more significant benefits in the trade-off between cost control and profit acquisition.
It is worth pointing out that the scientific setting of stop-loss positions must be closely based on the risk threshold that investors can bear and accurately defined.
In addition, when conducting in-depth analysis of wave peak patterns, if the peak of the second wave peak is significantly higher than the first wave peak, investors should decisively execute buy transactions after completing a solid bottoming construction at the bottom of the second wave peak.
In the actual operation of pattern analysis, we should not focus too much on subtle level differences, but should focus on clarifying the main direction of the trend and its corresponding level judgment.
In the highly complex and uncertain field of foreign exchange investment and trading, the Turtle Trading Method's strategy of using the breakthrough of the 20-day high as an entry signal has not been widely recognized and supported by professional investment groups and academic research.
A large number of foreign exchange trading experts with rich practical experience and profound theoretical literacy have pointed out through rigorous empirical analysis and theoretical deduction that this strategy has significant defects in the construction of the theoretical foundation. From a detailed analysis, the 20-day high point, a single data dimension, is arbitrarily selected as the core basis for trading decisions. It lacks strong support from multidisciplinary cross-theories such as financial market behavior and econometrics, and does not fully consider the complexity and randomness of market fluctuations, highlighting the strong subjective assumptions and arbitrary decision-making. At the same time, making trading decisions based only on the high point information of the daily candlestick chart ignores multi-dimensional key information such as trading volume, position volume and macroeconomic data in market transactions, which makes the source of decision-making information seriously insufficient, greatly weakening the scientificity and effectiveness of trading decisions. In sharp contrast, paying close attention to the breakthrough pattern or crossover signal of the moving average is recognized as the core key indicator for insight into market trend turning points and grasping trading opportunities. From the perspective of the theoretical system of technical analysis of financial markets, the moving average can effectively smooth the short-term noise of price fluctuations by weighted averaging the market price data within a certain period of time, highlighting the long-term trend of market prices. Therefore, its important role in accurately identifying market trend reversals and optimizing trading strategy formulation far exceeds the simple price breakthrough strategy relied on by the Turtle Trading Method.
From the perspective of adaptability of trading strategies, the Turtle Trading Method shows certain limitations in terms of trading style preferences, trader thinking patterns, and adaptability to market dynamics. This method seems to be more suitable for traders who hold conservative trading concepts, have relatively rigid thinking patterns, and tend to be overly dependent on established trading theories. When faced with the ever-changing and highly nonlinear dynamic operating environment of the foreign exchange market, such traders lack the ability to quickly integrate and deeply mine market information, making it difficult for them to flexibly adjust their trading strategies according to real-time market changes, and thus frequently encounter setbacks during trading, facing a greater risk of capital withdrawal. In the long run, they are likely to be forced to leave the foreign exchange investment and trading market due to continuous capital losses. From the perspective of market behavior and trading psychology, if such traders expect to achieve long-term stable profits in the field of foreign exchange investment and return to the market, they must deeply reflect on and systematically reconstruct their past trading strategies, break the constraints of the original mindset, actively introduce innovative trading concepts and methods, and build a dynamic trading strategy system that can adapt to the complex and changeable characteristics of the foreign exchange market.
13711580480@139.com
+86 137 1158 0480
+86 137 1158 0480
+86 137 1158 0480
Mr. Zhang
China · Guangzhou